Sex, Success and their Patterns of Correlation
While staring at the murals of naked women all over the walls of a 'love motel' I recently stayed in on a trip to Seoul, I couldn't help but ponder just much time I, (and every other guy I know) spends thinking about sex.
In addition to that, as I was there by myself on a shoestring budget, (and it was totally unlikely that I was gonna get any) I couldn't help but put a philospohical spin on it. It was either that or push-ups. Looking back, (or more aptly, looking around), caused me to reflect on a passage from a book I had read by Napolean Hill, called Think and Grow Rich. In that book, the author had suggested that oftentimes men who had achieve great levels of success are highly sexual in nature, but that they never achieved that success until they were in their 40s. The author hypothesized that this is because at that point, they are settled in, their sex drive has calmed down a bit, and they are turning their mind to other things. Intrinsically, in kind of a bizarre way, it seemed to make sense. For most of the guys who figure them out how to score early enough in life, all that drive, all that ambition goes into chasing after the opposite sex. I think as guys we've all known the dude who has no trouble with the opposite sex, and we also all know that that's all he ever talks about.
Conversely however, we've also all read about the guys who did achieve a lot of great things when they were young, and suprise suprise, most of them did so -at least in part- because they weren't concerned with the opposite sex. In the case of Muhammed Ali, from what I'd read, it's because he was never really good with them. (This is also the case with an All-Japan Judo champion I know.) In the case of Leonardo and Michaelangelo, I had heard that it was because they were gay and sexually frustrated. This also makes me wonder what was really going on when they named all the Ninja Turtles. If any of you are interested in writing a version of that Da Vinci code, I guarantee you'll have at least one reader ;)
Could it be that that's why Christianity and Catholicism put so much emphasis on celebacy as a path to living a righteous life (i.e. to keep the focus?). A good friend of mine who chose to remain so until he married is also the only person I've even known to have the discipline to develop an absolutely perfect looking body. If that's not a prime example then I don't know what is. It's enough to make you wonder if John Wayne Bobbit would have been better off without the 're-sewing'.
Coming up as a kid...and teen...and finally young adult, I always felt plagued by the fact that I was such an audaciously late bloomer. But then again, looking at where I'm at and what I'm doing now, as a function of it, I guess I should count my blessings.
In addition to that, as I was there by myself on a shoestring budget, (and it was totally unlikely that I was gonna get any) I couldn't help but put a philospohical spin on it. It was either that or push-ups. Looking back, (or more aptly, looking around), caused me to reflect on a passage from a book I had read by Napolean Hill, called Think and Grow Rich. In that book, the author had suggested that oftentimes men who had achieve great levels of success are highly sexual in nature, but that they never achieved that success until they were in their 40s. The author hypothesized that this is because at that point, they are settled in, their sex drive has calmed down a bit, and they are turning their mind to other things. Intrinsically, in kind of a bizarre way, it seemed to make sense. For most of the guys who figure them out how to score early enough in life, all that drive, all that ambition goes into chasing after the opposite sex. I think as guys we've all known the dude who has no trouble with the opposite sex, and we also all know that that's all he ever talks about.
Conversely however, we've also all read about the guys who did achieve a lot of great things when they were young, and suprise suprise, most of them did so -at least in part- because they weren't concerned with the opposite sex. In the case of Muhammed Ali, from what I'd read, it's because he was never really good with them. (This is also the case with an All-Japan Judo champion I know.) In the case of Leonardo and Michaelangelo, I had heard that it was because they were gay and sexually frustrated. This also makes me wonder what was really going on when they named all the Ninja Turtles. If any of you are interested in writing a version of that Da Vinci code, I guarantee you'll have at least one reader ;)
Could it be that that's why Christianity and Catholicism put so much emphasis on celebacy as a path to living a righteous life (i.e. to keep the focus?). A good friend of mine who chose to remain so until he married is also the only person I've even known to have the discipline to develop an absolutely perfect looking body. If that's not a prime example then I don't know what is. It's enough to make you wonder if John Wayne Bobbit would have been better off without the 're-sewing'.
Coming up as a kid...and teen...and finally young adult, I always felt plagued by the fact that I was such an audaciously late bloomer. But then again, looking at where I'm at and what I'm doing now, as a function of it, I guess I should count my blessings.

